Don't listen to them!  They are all evil, dizzy with power, and arrogant to a degree you cannot imagine (but you must try).  I picture them like Charlie Chaplin playing Hitler in "The Great Dictator," fondling his globe, dreaming of limitless power, conquest, rule, of the entire world, fondling and caressing it, lovingly, madly, obsessively, tossing and turning it in his hands and on his feet, as the plaything and symbol of his uncontrollable madness.

Focus more of your attention on THE POWER ELITE and their mad network of INTERLOCKING RELATIONSHIPS.  It is THEY who are the real power behind the throne.  Wake up and do this before it is too late and you have lost your heads, mad with thirst and hunger, cowering with fear, mired in poverty, and powerless to resist their nefarious aims.

Don't cooperate with them, don't acquiesce, don't listen to them, resist them, tell them 'no,' correct them, remind them that they are children of God and will be judged for their crimes, protest, boycott, go on strikes, clog the streets and government offices, file petitions and lists of grievances with your elected officials, pester them, harass them, write them, e-mail them, lecture them, CONTROL them!  Take the initiative! 

The enemy postures in gallant show, but you must stop being afraid of them!  They cannot control us all.  If we all refuse to cooperate with them, there is nothing they can do about it!  Sic semper tyrannis!   

Their sin is that they are attempting to play "god."  They plan to turn this world into a totalitarian state, a so-called "New World Order" (read: dictatorial hell on earth), instead of "Novus Ordo Seclorum" (A New Order of the Ages, and what the Founding Fathers had planned for us). 

But they are in for a surprise; they will only succeed in destroying the world because of their utopian schemes rather than turning it into "paradise."  They are unleashing forces upon the world that even they will not be able to control!  When it does get out of control, they will blame it all ON YOU! 

Ultimately, THEY THEMSELVES are also useful idiots of the Devil, though their unbelievable pride, hubris, and arrogance has blinded them to this tragic fact.

Green is another "dominant social theme."  Don't fall for it, folks.

This whole idea of a "stimulated economy" is completely absurd and flies in the face of sound economic theory.  It is a complete and total fraud.  It is legalized plunder! 

The plunderers assume that you will fall in love with their "stimulus money" because it was stolen from somebody else and not from you!  They figure that since you were on the receiving end of the loot, why should you care? 

This "stimulus money" is a sop meant to hook you all on government largesse, making you compliant, subservient, desperate, obedient, fearful, and unable to resist the next phase of their mad, utopian-socialist-dictatorial scheme.  It is meant to strip you of your rights, and destroy the free market.  The "stimulus," like all other temptations and "dominant social themes," is meant to persuade, brainwash, and bamboozle you into accepting authoritarian measures to fix the phony "crises" trumped up by the power elite themselves.
 
Don't fall for it!  Don't swallow the poison!  Don't listen to the propaganda mouthpieces!

The government doesn't have the money for these things.  It is either simply printed (with no backing or collateral of any kind), or BORROWED.  In addition, this money is "fiat money," money not backed by gold or silver which national monetary authorities have the power to issue WITHOUT LEGAL CONSTRAINTS.  That means that they can print as much as they want, inflate it, toss it around anywhere they like (even to foreign banks!) to buy people off, strengthen their grip on power, punish their enemies, or shut people up.

Now it doesn't look like such a great idea, does it, folks?

"creating jobs"?  Government DOES NOT "create jobs"!  It takes resources away from the private sector, ostensibly to provide "vital services" that the public cannot easily do without.  But the latter and noble idea of republican government was long ago tossed overboard by the crooks BOTH INSIDE AND OUTSIDE government, working hand in glove, in a cabal, REGARDLESS OF POLITICAL PARTY AFFILIATION, forming a wonderfully lucrative conspiracy, to rip this country off six ways to Sunday while turning you all into serfs at the same time.

Perhaps some words of wisdom from the Frenchman, Frederic Bastiat would be a propos:

"Everyone wants to live at the expense of the state. They forget that the state lives at the expense of everyone."

Further explanations of "dominant social themes" and other propaganda terms and their political implications for our country can be read with profit at: http://thedailybell.com/

The bad news is that they lie about everything.

The good news is that the Internet is making it harder and harder for them to lie to us. But we must not suffer the illusion that they are the ones really setting the agenda, though we all know they should be. It is the power elite which is calling the shots, make no mistake.

Was Clinton alone in this? Hardly!

Was he an extraordinarily bad president who should never have been allowed anywhere near a government office of any kind, let alone the Oval Office? You bet!

If it's any consolation to "liberals," I am reading and hearing more and more bad things about the Bush family on the Internet. The prognosis for that family does not look good.

P.S.,

One good thing Clinton did was to help me increase my vocabulary.

I do think that the power elite is losing its stranglehold over America.  How much or how fast this is actually happening is a matter of speculation.  If one accesses the Internet regularly, it definitely seems that the process is proceeding full speed ahead, for the Internet is aflame with reports and video programs chronicling the loss.  "Conspiracy theory" is one of the hottest topics on the net.  I feel certain that in some cases, people in the intelligence agencies and other well-connected individuals, are leaking information at regular intervals to their favorite news outlets and websites. 

When I venture out of my house, however, I get quite another picture. I meet many people, far too many, who are blissfully unaware of the power elite, the vast majority, in fact.  Nobody I know talks about it except me.  Well, I finally have my children in my camp on this, it is true.  I even got one of my kids to send the Aaron Russo video out to their friends on the net.

What does this all mean?  I'm sure that in one sense it means that a lot of people with whom I meet are dreadfully uneducated, and miseducated.  In another, it means that the power elite has been remarkably successful in keeping their agenda well under cover.

What worries me most, though, is what will the power elite do about all this?  How will they react?  Will they do something rash or dangerous if they feel as threatened by this new "Gutenberg Press" as I think they do?  Perhaps the best way to answer that is to consider the problem from their point of view.  When I do this, I think of all that power concentrated into so few hands, and that makes me very nervous.

Such questions are another very hot topic on the Internet as well.  Look at 9/11.  The Internet has called the official investigation into serious question, if not destroyed it outright.  I did not realize this until I got into the Internet reports and videos and was able to consider the issue for myself.  The "resisters" have a point; we have been lied to and want answers, NOW!  No more lies!  So far they are not talking, but public pressure is building.  Government officials have, in my opinion, completely lost whatever credibility they may have had in the past. 

But where do we go from there?  Will the next elections solve this problem?  I rather doubt it.  I think there are going to be some more convulsions, red herrings, and "false flag" events to throw us off the scent, confuse us, and persuade us into accepting more of their authoritarian "solutions."

If you were in the shoes of the power elite, would you just stand by and let your empire crumble?  Not likely.  Think of the sheer arrogance of these people.  Patricians and royalty all, they have for generations groomed themselves for their "New World Order," and they are not about to let that dream slip away.

I think they know perfectly well the truth of the matter; it's all about CONTROL of the people.

One of the most cherished goals of these maniacs is to disarm the people. All dictatorships have done this. This one will, too, if we let them.

Remember also that Obama wants to have his own private, domestic, military force, separate from, but just as big, just as powerful, the regular military (you can probably bring up his speech on this on You Tube).

I presume that they will also be just as well armed as the regular military.

Go to You Tube. Type in: jesse ventura conspiracy theory big brother

Watch the program and keep your powder dry.

A "dominant social theme" is a belief system (usually concerning a purported social or natural problem) launched by the monetary elite that grows into an archetype or "meme," usually after much repetition. The problem may be centered on people themselves (overpopulation) or caused by people (global warming).  Dominant social themes often are launched from the centers of the power elite's global architecture, including the United Nations, World Bank, World Trade Organization and World Health Organization, where the related problems are declared to be such. The themes are then rebroadcast by the mainstream media.

Clever isn't it?

Prohibitively high prices for medical care are primarily caused by overregulation of the industry by government.

Prices are what control and guide our economy, at least when it is allowed to function normally as the free market it was meant to be. When government interferes with too many regulations, it needlessly drives prices up.

Prices are the nexus and controlling mechanism, and "brain," if you will, of our economic system. Rather than an elite, command-and-control group of "finance ministers," or a king, prices are what get the job done, though it seems paradoxical to a person who knows nothing of economics. The command-and-control scheme is what Obama and his henchmen want to foist on us.

In such a scheme, those in charge would simply issue orders that things be done, produced, distributed, and so forth, all done by fiat and edict. Oligarchies, Communism/Socialism, and Kingships, are examples of such systems. Obama would have believe that a socialist system would be the best, though this is nonsense, of course. To live in such a system would be to live in a dictatorship. Thus, Obama is trying to sell you on the "joys" of living in a dictatorship!

Our economy is superior to such tyrannical systems because PRICES control the flow of goods and services to where they are needed most and can make the most money and do the most good. We do not need a little group of dictators or bureaucrats making the zillions of decisions which must be made in an huge economy of scale like ours.

Besides, the elite bureaucrats in charge would be quickly overwhelmed with all these zillions of decisions. They could not do anything without instantly becoming dicators, because only a dictator could have and exercise the unlimited power necessary to make the economy and its people move and do things.

This DOES NOT mean that government has no role to play in business, as skeptics are always quick to scream that "we think." It does. The rule of law is a critical factor in an economy by maintaining order like a referee. It offers predictability and stability, inspires confidence that rationality instead of whim and fiat will prevail.

The problem is that now the government is both referee and player! The rule of law has been distorted into an intimidating, arbitrary, and dictatorial spoils system for the power elite.

That drives up prices by distorting markets, diverting scarces resources with alternative uses into less productive and less rational areas, and by preventing businesses from moving forward with plans because nobody can figure out or predict the byzantine workings or plans of the government.

Obama is a pacifist and parlor pink.  This is the sort of folly one would expect from such a person.  Obviously, this is going to be a thumb-twiddling war of attrition, "tinkering at the margins," if you will (à la Bill Clinton), but with no clear resolution and NO MENTION OF FINAL VICTORY!  That is what Barry Soetoro has set us up for.  This is not going to end well.

His speech on this was really a prelude to withdrawal, "peace with honor" (even though the enemy is still not defeated).  It is a "feint," an elaborate feint, but still a feint.

Yet, even though he be a more or less typical "anti-war" socialist (he campaigned vigorously on this point in the best tradition of anti-war protesters and pandered shamelessly to that crowd), he would yet be the vehicle of deeper, more problematic and widespread war than the one that he inherited and promised to end!  How incredibly ironic and disastrous!  How many more people will die needlessly as a result?

In its best tradition, the US does not fight wars of attrition or guerilla wars, or "police actions," Vietnam being a misguided anomaly escalated by another "big government" tyrant, the dreadful LBJ, whose mental illness locked him into irrational responses and fantastic schemes, and whose obsession with power and uncontrolable arrogance blinded him to any sane alternatives. 

We do not need to fight such wars, since we have plenty of awesome weapons which can easily be brought to bear on the enemy for a very quick and decisive victory.  Think of the lives which could be saved by using our "primary weapons."  But neither Bush the Elder nor Bush the Younger would use them.  Now Soetoro won't, either.  In God's name, why not? 

We are fighting with one hand tied behind our backs!  We are fighting with "small arms."  We are fighting a guerilla war, a war of attrition, and being bled to death an inch at a time. 

We do not need or have to fight like this!  This kind of fighting is for those who HAVE NO OTHER OPTIONS! (thus, the "assymmetric warfare" of the Muslim terrorists).  But if the Muslim fanatics had better, more powerful weapons to use against us, THEY WOULD NOT HESITATE TO USE THEM! 

Barry Soetoro can end this in an instant.  He had better go ahead and do so, because as in WWII, we are in a new arms race, a race against time.  In WWII, both the Germans and the Japanese had nuclear weapons programs, too, and pressed us right down to the wire.  Fortunately, we beat them to the punch.  But Truman did not hesitate to use the atom bomb to stop the fighting.

However, Barry Soetoro chides the US for somehow being "the cause of all this."  He bows before Saudi and Japanese kings.  He grovels like Hitler before Hindenburg.  He postures.  He temporizes.  He pontificates (after all, he was a law professor at U of Chicago!).  He "negotiates."  He "sits down" for coffee klatches with dictators and thinks he can "reason" with them (not realizing that the average dictator is a psychopath).

Barry Soetoro fiddles, quibbles, pettifogs, and vacillates over "diplomacy" when he would be better advised to bomb our enemies down into Hell without further ado.

We are now in an "information war," make no mistake. This war is being fought mostly in cyber space and over the air waves. This type of warfare is unprecedented. Never before has the world been so flooded with information of such variety and kind. This battle is extremely fierce and the protagonists take no prisoners. To the victors go the spoils, and the spoils are huge, as are the political consequences. There have been newspaper rivalries in the past, but nothing like this.  

It's getting so people of different persuasions can't even talk to each other.  When they do talk to each other, they sound as if they were talking about two completely different countries. How can a country go on like that without its people sharing at least SOME concepts about it???  This is reflected in the news outlets that we frequent, of course. 

At any rate, it's always been true that news outlets are very much political animals, just as man is a political animal. Although it is indeed shocking to see just how low some news media will stoop, one must keep in mind that they are suffering for their sins. Many of these newspapers are on the brink of collapse. The major TV networks' ratings are way down from what they used to be. They are losing advertising revenue. They don't look to get any better. Good riddance.

Obama does not respect property rights. Everything he says and does reflects this fundamental fact. If we want to understand people like Obama and whether we really want to reelect this kind of candidate, we must recognize and understand this glaring fact. The additional fact that we elected such a person also says something glaring and unpleasant about us and our flawed perceptions of presidential candidates. But that's another question which I shall leave for another post.

Of all the observations that we can make about Obama, and of all the critical areas in which we may judge him, this business of "property rights" may be the most important. We the people know, instinctively, how important our "property rights" are. The question is, does Obama? I say no. I have asked myself over and over the question, why not? The answer lies in the fact that Obama is a socialist, but then, why do socialists not respect property rights? It's a question that will not die and it mysteriously surrounds the Obama administration and colors and flavors virtually everything it says and does.

Obama does not seem to understand that the key to prosperity in our society is our free market system. In this system, prosperity is solidly linked to the protection of property rights. Obama seeks to break this vital link. He would replace that system with one in which the state runs things and owns everything. Everyone will work for the state.   To Obama, that constitutes "progress" because it removes the "unfairness" of our present system so filled with inequality. To us conservatives and constitutionalists, that constitutes the road to serfdom.   Inequality there may be in our society, but for the government to take over things (clearly Obama's goal) will be a disaster for everyone, since living conditions would be far worse that what we have now. Obama does not understand that it is not just the property of the rich which our system protects; on the contrary, the rich are not so much in need of protection as the poor.